<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Mail Marketing: How Much Is Too Much?</title>
	<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/</link>
	<description>bly.com direct marketing blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hentay</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-346812</link>
		<dc:creator>hentay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-346812</guid>
		<description>Guter Aufstellungsort, ja!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guter Aufstellungsort, ja!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-270953</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-270953</guid>
		<description>For me, one e-mail everyday is painful enough for me to see and I will never subscribe to any marketing newsletter with that level of intensity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, one e-mail everyday is painful enough for me to see and I will never subscribe to any marketing newsletter with that level of intensity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266689</guid>
		<description>You're right, it is a forced free trial.  I never saw it in e-mail before. I wonder if they are getting a positive overall response, or the cyber equivalent of shredded Bible tracts stuffed in BREs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, it is a forced free trial.  I never saw it in e-mail before. I wonder if they are getting a positive overall response, or the cyber equivalent of shredded Bible tracts stuffed in BREs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bly</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266368</guid>
		<description>Jodi: I understand your frustration. Some print newsletter publishers use this approach in snail mail, sending 3 free -- and unrequested -- issues. This is called a "forced free trial."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jodi: I understand your frustration. Some print newsletter publishers use this approach in snail mail, sending 3 free &#8212; and unrequested &#8212; issues. This is called a &#8220;forced free trial.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-266316</guid>
		<description>Right now, too much is a media business newsletter that cheerily informed me two days ago that I had been "selected" to receive 4 trial issues of their e-newsletter.  They started as a print publication, and I was startled as I had never seen this approach for e-mail.  I couldn't quite decide what I thought at first, but later came to the conclusion that it was annoying and spam-like.  Since it was annoying, and the content wasn't relevant, I emailed them back to unsubscribe.  Since then, I've gotten three more e-mails from them (including two so far today) inviting me to seminars, making other offers, etc. The last one came right after I emailed them a second time to opt-out.  Now, I understand that they can't run the suppression instantly, but that many e-mails to someone who absolutely did not ask for them is too many!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, too much is a media business newsletter that cheerily informed me two days ago that I had been &#8220;selected&#8221; to receive 4 trial issues of their e-newsletter.  They started as a print publication, and I was startled as I had never seen this approach for e-mail.  I couldn&#8217;t quite decide what I thought at first, but later came to the conclusion that it was annoying and spam-like.  Since it was annoying, and the content wasn&#8217;t relevant, I emailed them back to unsubscribe.  Since then, I&#8217;ve gotten three more e-mails from them (including two so far today) inviting me to seminars, making other offers, etc. The last one came right after I emailed them a second time to opt-out.  Now, I understand that they can&#8217;t run the suppression instantly, but that many e-mails to someone who absolutely did not ask for them is too many!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristina</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265200</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265200</guid>
		<description>At this point, I have to answer your question by saying "All email I've been receiving lately is too much..." But that's just because I'm frustrated with spam -- pregnancy hormones may have something to do with the frustration as well... but I can't be sure. Add to that the spam I have to go through on my blog ... UGH!!

Anywho, 4 emails in ONE day -- and right after signing up -- is WAY too much. I don't know who made that brainchild decision...

I accept weekly and monthly newsletters IF they contain useful information. I'll tolerate one or two marketing messages a month, but more than that, I unsub right away.

Just my 2 cents!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, I have to answer your question by saying &#8220;All email I&#8217;ve been receiving lately is too much&#8230;&#8221; But that&#8217;s just because I&#8217;m frustrated with spam &#8212; pregnancy hormones may have something to do with the frustration as well&#8230; but I can&#8217;t be sure. Add to that the spam I have to go through on my blog &#8230; UGH!!</p>
<p>Anywho, 4 emails in ONE day &#8212; and right after signing up &#8212; is WAY too much. I don&#8217;t know who made that brainchild decision&#8230;</p>
<p>I accept weekly and monthly newsletters IF they contain useful information. I&#8217;ll tolerate one or two marketing messages a month, but more than that, I unsub right away.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265048</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265048</guid>
		<description>I think from what I'm reading here is 'Content is King' to your particular target market?.  

Yes, I agree, however the Frequency/Opt Out Ratio is the also a key determinant, which I believe should be dictated by the need to get product/service information to market in a timely manner that reflects the demands of the market at any given time of the year.  

In my previous efforts, I have seen e-mail frequency fluid and dynamic in nature.  Thinking a little more holistic, for instance, known seasonal factors. For B2C SEM's Some may lower their frequency during holiday periods and increase frequency at site visit peak times - thus getting more for their online advertising dollar.  B2B example. In the UK governement and corporate [not all] fiscal year ends are in April, so procurement departmens have budgets to spend, which may not be availble post April.  E-Mail Frequency can be high in the Feb/March run up and tail off until the next peak in the procurement cycle.  

So as well as 'Content being King', the business environment may be a key factor in e-mail frequency for an SEM's target market(s). Here I'm adding a new component 'Dynamic' Email distribution. Let's catch these Lemmings JUST as they are about to jump off the cliff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think from what I&#8217;m reading here is &#8216;Content is King&#8217; to your particular target market?.  </p>
<p>Yes, I agree, however the Frequency/Opt Out Ratio is the also a key determinant, which I believe should be dictated by the need to get product/service information to market in a timely manner that reflects the demands of the market at any given time of the year.  </p>
<p>In my previous efforts, I have seen e-mail frequency fluid and dynamic in nature.  Thinking a little more holistic, for instance, known seasonal factors. For B2C SEM&#8217;s Some may lower their frequency during holiday periods and increase frequency at site visit peak times - thus getting more for their online advertising dollar.  B2B example. In the UK governement and corporate [not all] fiscal year ends are in April, so procurement departmens have budgets to spend, which may not be availble post April.  E-Mail Frequency can be high in the Feb/March run up and tail off until the next peak in the procurement cycle.  </p>
<p>So as well as &#8216;Content being King&#8217;, the business environment may be a key factor in e-mail frequency for an SEM&#8217;s target market(s). Here I&#8217;m adding a new component &#8216;Dynamic&#8217; Email distribution. Let&#8217;s catch these Lemmings JUST as they are about to jump off the cliff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Duffy</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Duffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265038</guid>
		<description>And you did state that the musician was an opt-in list.  Fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you did state that the musician was an opt-in list.  Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bly</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265018</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-265018</guid>
		<description>Mike Duffy: e-mail and RSS are BOTH opt-in: I don't send e-mails to anyone who does not double opt-in as a subscriber to my e-list. If the recipient has not opted in, he is getting spam, not legitimate e-mail marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Duffy: e-mail and RSS are BOTH opt-in: I don&#8217;t send e-mails to anyone who does not double opt-in as a subscriber to my e-list. If the recipient has not opted in, he is getting spam, not legitimate e-mail marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kantor</title>
		<link>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-264872</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bly.com/blog/general/e-mail-marketing-how-much-is-too-much/#comment-264872</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Bob. More than one a week from a source such as the musician you spoke of is too much.

On the other hand, I subscribe to Microsoft's and Apple's newsletter and I appreciate it when they notify me of downloads or free templates. About once a week is appropriate for them.

So it depends on how important that resource is, especially when it impacts my computer and my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Bob. More than one a week from a source such as the musician you spoke of is too much.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I subscribe to Microsoft&#8217;s and Apple&#8217;s newsletter and I appreciate it when they notify me of downloads or free templates. About once a week is appropriate for them.</p>
<p>So it depends on how important that resource is, especially when it impacts my computer and my work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
